![]() ![]()
Testing and validation are two other aspects of the game. It makes them more employable and they end up doing something cool and challenging. Readcube papers google docs verification#Hopefully, I've convinced you that it is valuable to teach verification to undergrads. This makes the job of verification engineers much more challenging. ![]() There are new scenarios and new corner cases that have to be verified. But verification of these larger designs isn't as simple as testing just the interconnections. Most design still happens in Verilog, although some new HDLs have started to emerge (Chisel, BlueSpec, etc).īigger designs are usually done by integrating smaller designs. Look at the evolution of verification over the last 20 years (SV, OVM, e, VMM, UVM, etc). (This one is a little controversial) I think the field of verification is more dynamic. Verification engineers typically employ agile methodologies in their work. The skill set is at a higher level of abstraction than a typical designer has. They use complicated constructs (including those used in parallel programming) and data structures. Readcube papers google docs full#Verification engineers are almost full fleshed software engineers. So, learning verification as a skill is very beneficial. So, if you are looking for a job in the field of computer engineering, chances are that you will find a verification job more easily. Not so much variety when it comes to design.įor every designer, every company needs over 2-3 verification engineers. There are so many things to learn and do as a verification engineer - formal verification, assertions, UVM, coverage, checkers, stimulus, testbench, regression management, etc. So, this class would follow a design class. It is true that you can't understand verification, if you don't know design. I'm here to say that every university should have a class on verification (and testing and validation more on that later) for undergrads. I am not talking the basic digital logic design class where students learn about logic gates and state machines. Note here that when I say design, I am talking about a relatively advanced digital class that teaches VHDL or Verilog and talks about designing a simple processor or some complex blocks involving datapaths and control logic. And even that class is typically a graduate class. But only a few universities have a class on verification. There are classes about design (digital design) in every university's curriculum. One reason why this happens is because the academia emphasizes design way more than verification. Verification is a much more challenging and interesting problem to solve than design. People like to design and think that verification is not interesting. However, somehow verification doesn't have the "reputation" that design has. It is a very interesting role that involves a lot of innovation, execution and cool stuff. Microsoft Teams' calendar for meetings that originate from within Microsoft Teamsįor a significant portion of my time at NVIDIA, I did what is called design verification. Google Calendar for most meetings, events and reminders that originate outside of Microsoft Teams For some reason, people prefer Slack over other apps. Slack for other stuff (like research group, cross-university research). Microsoft Teams for all the work that I initiate Zoom for meetings that involve others who are not comfortable with Microsoft Teams Microsoft Teams for all research work that I initiate Readcube papers google docs how to#I recently found a blog talking about how to save PDFs on OneDrive/Google Drive and only have the metadata synced by Zotero. ![]() I liked Zotero too, but the storage is a bit expensive. Also, there was no way to upload my current folder hierarchy into their library. I loved this app called ReadCube Papers, but there were some bugs with their handling of IEEE and ACM papers (which are the main sources of papers for me). Currently I organize the papers I read using folders on OneDrive and don't have a good way of taking notes - some notes are on printed pages, some notes are in OneNote ![]() I am looking forward to Microsoft Loop though :) I tried using Notion for a bit, but it was a steep learning curve. I loved it! But haven't used it for personal notes. I used Confluence for notes when I was at NVIDIA. I also use Sticky Notes app sometimes, but I want to avoid it because there is no organizational structure provided by the Sticky Notes app I love it! I can't live without this app! In OneNote, you get notebooks, sections and pages arranged visually on a screen. I like Google Docs but I hate that it doesn't provide any organizational structure In a short team (2-3 people), I just use OneNote's To Do tagįor larger teams, I have used Microsoft Planner I used it for my personal/individual tasks. I cannot live without a good system for information organization, time management, task tracking and collaboration. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |